Saba loses Keystone and Baillie Gifford US Growth votes
Non-Saba shareholders almost unanimously voted against the proposals at each investment trust
Non-Saba shareholders almost unanimously voted against the proposals at each investment trust
|
|
Amendments to company law would require platforms to opt in investors automatically to receive company information and voting rights
|
|
Outside of Saba’s shares, only 0.15% of the votes cast were in favour of Saba’s proposals to replace the trust’s board
|
|
Trusts managed by BlackRock have been assured by Saba that it would not oust and replace their boards
|
|
Results ahead of vote to remove current board at the encouragement of Saba Capital
|
|
Saba CEO confirmed the hedge fund would seek to merge trusts into a single vehicle and invest back into UK assets
|
|
Board had proposed rolling the trust into the open-ended Baillie Gifford Positive Change fund
|
|
Herald board responds to Saba’s announced plans to offer a cash exit, should its attempts to appoint its own directors be successful
|
|
Trusts urge shareholders to vote against resolutions in February meetings
|
|
The US hedge fund’s ‘self-serving and destructive proposals’ are a veiled attempt to take effective control of UK trusts
|
|
The US activist plans to replace the boards of seven trusts, in what some call an ‘entirely self-serving’ move
|
|
Activist investor is seeking to replace the boards of Baillie Gifford US Growth, Henderson Opportunities and more
|
|